Those looking for an indication when Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac may exit conservatorship did not receive one during recent Congressional testimony from the director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA). Under the Donald Trump administration, the end of conservatorship was a matter of when, not if. That has changed somewhat during the Joe Biden administration.
Potential homebuyers are finding various ways of dealing with the new reality of higher mortgage rates that are closer to historic norms. During the recent pandemic, mortgage rates sank below 3 percent. In January 2021, the average 30-year rate hit an all-time low of 2.65, according to Freddie Mac. By October 2023, however, that rate was nearly at 8 percent.
Anybody who has bought a home, has tried to buy a home, or is involved in selling or financing real estate knows housing affordability has been an issue for some time. Last week, real estate brokerage Redfin released data showing the extent of how challenging it is for some consumers to buy a home.
As the first quarter of 2024 draws to a close, the latest news shows an industry in consolidation that may have expanded opportunities to finance this year while still dealing with the rising costs of homeownership. A recent report from Fitch Ratings shows that the largest U.S. non-bank mortgage lenders are gaining market share. This is largely due to consolidation and the exit of smaller lenders.
The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) expects to transition to new crediting reporting requirements and new credit score models in the fourth quarter of 2025. “Following extensive stakeholder engagement and input, FHFA is aligning the implementation date of the bi-merge credit reporting requirement with the transition from the Classic FICO credit score model,” the agency said in a statement.
Last week I received a file to underwrite where the borrower’s tax return indicated that he earned more than 1.6 million in income. The Mortgage Loan Officer and the mortgage loan processor calculated the ratios based on the same income. The ratios were 2% over 4% and it was a slam dunk deal.as far as they were concerned.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
My previous article explained how HUD (FHA) wanted underwriters to review and to come up with an income trend using the borrower’s personal tax returns. There are many borrowers that self-employed and these borrowers use other forms to demonstrate their income trend.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
Underwriters from time to time have difficulty in determining the income to use when they receive a complicated or very involved tax return.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
The way we can handle both business and personal tax returns is pretty much same. The key to the right analysis is to opt for right direction. We can divide the analysis procedure in 3 steps.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
Written By: Bonnie Wildt
I have said it before and I will say it again and that is, do not believe everything you hear or read for that matter. In this particular instance I am referring to AUS Findings. I have had countless conversations with processors and loan officer who want to know why I am asking for documentation that the AUS findings have clearly stated wasn’t needed or worse, they can’t believe I am turning a loan down that has an Approve/Eligible. So here it is again and pay particular attention to the details because just because you have an Approve/Eligible or Accept doesn’t necessarily mean you have a done deal.