Mortgage rates remain elevated, marking the third straight week of increases and leaving many homebuyers wondering when relief might come. The average 30-year fixed mortgage rate is holding near 6.9%, a level that continues to put pressure on affordability across the housing market.
A federal appeals court has revived tariffs imposed by the Trump administration, temporarily reversing a lower court’s earlier decision that struck them down. The ruling underscores ongoing legal and constitutional battles over the scope of presidential authority on trade.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has announced the rescission of 67 guidance documents, including several related to the mortgage industry, as part of a broader effort to streamline oversight and align regulatory practices with statutory authority. The decision marks a significant shift in the bureau’s approach to rulemaking and compliance.
The U.S. housing market is confronting renewed headwinds as mortgage rates surged past 7% in response to a credit rating downgrade from Moody’s. The agency lowered the U.S. government’s long-term credit rating from AAA to Aa1, citing fiscal instability and a growing federal debt burden as primary concerns.
The U.S. housing market, already under pressure from high mortgage rates and affordability concerns, is facing added strain due to the impact of former President Donald Trump’s tariff policies. These tariffs have driven up the cost of construction materials, further complicating the economic landscape for homebuilders and buyers alike.
In his first time to testify before Congress since taking over his post last July, HUD Secretary Julian Castro on Wednesday defended the decision to lower Federal Housing Administration (FHA) mortgage insurance premiums and predicted that the agency's Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund would exceed the required 2 percent ratio within two years.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
The government forced lenders to offer and grant Qualified Mortgages (QM) which eliminated what was called ‘subprime” mortgages. The QM mortgage applies strictly to the conforming loan amount. Lenders have found a loophole in the law and are offering non – qualified mortgages (NQM) to borrowers that require jumbo mortgage financing and loans for borrowers with investment properties regardless of the loan amount.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
I have testified at several mortgage fraud trials at the request of the federal government due to receiving subpoenas to appear in court as an expert witness for the government. The one thing I have learned is that no one has enough money and time to fight the government. One of the trials that I testified at was held in Chicago, IL.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
This week I would like to talk about something a little different that many of us have to face in the workplace. Day in and day out we get up and go to work knowing what we have to deal with each day. Being a mortgage processor or an underwriter is not an easy job to have.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMP® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMP® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMP® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMP®. Nothing contained in this article should be considered legal advice.
Written By: Bonnie Wildt
I have said it before and I will say it again and that is, do not believe everything you hear or read for that matter. In this particular instance I am referring to AUS Findings. I have had countless conversations with processors and loan officer who want to know why I am asking for documentation that the AUS findings have clearly stated wasn’t needed or worse, they can’t believe I am turning a loan down that has an Approve/Eligible. So here it is again and pay particular attention to the details because just because you have an Approve/Eligible or Accept doesn’t necessarily mean you have a done deal.